Lexicographical Inference over Inconsistent DL-Based Ontologies
نویسندگان
چکیده
Logical inconsistency may often occur throughout the development stage of a DL-based ontology. We apply the lexicographic inference to reason over inconsistent DL-based ontologies without repairing them first. We address the problem of checking consequences in a SHIQ ontology that are classically inferred from every consistent (or coherent) subontology having the highest lexicographic precedence. We propose a method for compiling a SHIQ ontology to a propositional program so that the problem can be solved in polynomial calls to a SAT solver. We prove that this time complexity is worst-case optimal in data complexity. In order to make the method more scalable, we also present partitionbased techniques to optimize the calling of SAT solvers.
منابع مشابه
Paraconsistent query answering over DL-Lite ontologies
Consistent query answering over description logic-based ontologies is an important topic in ontology engineering as it can provide meaningful answers to queries posed over inconsistent ontologies. Current approaches for dealing with this problem usually consist of two steps: the first step is extracting some consistent sub-ontologies of an inconsistent ontology, then posing the query over these...
متن کاملConsistent Query Answering over Description Logic Ontologies
Description Logics (DLs) have been widely used in the last years as formal language for specifying ontologies. In several contexts, as ontology-based data integration, it may frequently happen that data contradict the intensional knowledge provided by the ontology through which they are accessed, which therefore may result inconsistent. In this paper, we analyze the problem of consistent query ...
متن کاملTowards Tractable and Practical ABox Abduction over Inconsistent Description Logic Ontologies
ABox abduction plays an important role in reasoning over description logic (DL) ontologies. However, it does not work with inconsistent DL ontologies. To tackle this problem while achieving tractability, we generalize ABox abduction from the classical semantics to an inconsistency-tolerant semantics, namely the Intersection ABox Repair (IAR) semantics, and propose the notion of IAR-explanations...
متن کاملAn Argumentative Approach to Reasoning with Inconsistent Ontologies
Standard approaches to reasoning with Description Logics (DL) ontologies require them to be consistent. However, as ontologies are complex entities and sometimes built upon other imported ontologies, inconsistencies can arise. In this paper, we present a framework for reasoning with inconsistent DL ontologies. Our proposal involves expressing DL ontologies as Defeasible Logic Programs (DeLP). G...
متن کاملEfficient Query Answering over Expressive Inconsistent Description Logics
Inconsistent-tolerant semantics, like the IAR and ICAR semantics, have been proposed as means to compute meaningful query answers over inconsistent Description Logic (DL) ontologies. In the current paper we present a framework for scalable query answering under both the IAR and ICAR semantics, which is based on highly efficient data saturation systems. Our approach is sound and complete for ont...
متن کامل